Moderators: David Martin, dave robinson, Iain Purdon, George Geddes
noelford wrote:Sorry, but that's really not helpful or relevant now. That sample is the early one which is not at all representative of the unit at its current stage of development. As I understand it, a new set of sample sound-files is on the way soon. If taking stock is in order, bear in mind the large number of players at Northwich who could not tell the difference between the current model and the Meazzi.
noelford wrote:As I said, Dave, that demo is not the unit we are talking about. I (and a lot more players) believe that Charlie really has cracked it with the current model.
dave robinson wrote:noelford wrote:Sorry, but that's really not helpful or relevant now. That sample is the early one which is not at all representative of the unit at its current stage of development. As I understand it, a new set of sample sound-files is on the way soon. If taking stock is in order, bear in mind the large number of players at Northwich who could not tell the difference between the current model and the Meazzi.
Noel, the comparison with the Meazzi that you speak of is invalid, as Hank's machine was a completely different beast to the Meazzi tape echo. I wouldn't want a machine that sounds like a Meazzi tape echo - it's not what it was.
I hope Charlie realises this and get's the sound of the records instead, knowing him I'm certain that he will and I look forward to the final product.
I have played through and heard several Meazzi tape echo machines and still firmly believe the guitar and amp are more influential in obtaining the right sound.
I know some of you will all shout the name Justin Daish as an example because he had his Meazzi and the sound at last years SM, but remember the amp he was playing it through? No echo machine will give you the sound on it's own.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests