Why 54s and not 57/62s for "that sound"

Anything to do with Fender, Burns and other guitars; also amps, effects units including eTap, plus any other music making accessories

Moderators: David Martin, dave robinson, Iain Purdon, George Geddes

Re: Why 54s and not 57/62s for "that sound"

Postby rmfrance » Mon Mar 07, 2011 11:07 am

My experience has been that, tonally, it's at least as much the guitar as the pickups. Many years ago I had a mid-70s Strat (maple neck sunburst) which never sounded as good as it looked, despite all my efforts with alternative pickups. Eventually I picked up an Alder-bodied '62 and the difference was simply astonishing - I won't be selling that one! There's a warmth (not just sustain) to the acoustic sound which I feel is the x-factor; without it you're just never going to get a fat, warm sound when you plug in.
Interestingly - to me anyway :-) - a Simon Neil Squier I bought awhile back to save gigging the '62 always sounded pretty good acoustically but disappointing through the amp. After changing the trem unit for a steel-block Wilkinson (US string spacing) bridge/trem unit and popping in a set of Bare Knuckle PUs the sound is more than good enough to take out for live shows. And it plays beautifully.
Conclusion: we play the guitar, not the pickups - but both need to be 'right'...
rmfrance
 

Previous

Return to Gear

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Keith Bateman and 58 guests

Ads by Google
These advertisements are selected and placed by Google to assist with the cost of site maintenance.
ShadowMusic is not responsible for the content of external advertisements.