36-24-36
Moderators: David Martin, dave robinson, Iain Purdon, George Geddes
14 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: 36-24-36
by Dance with Shadows » Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:06 pm
In metric, 90 60 90 is a little bit thin.
- Dance with Shadows
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 1:04 am
- Full Real Name: Michael Brooks
Re: 36-24-36
by Stu's Dad » Sat Feb 08, 2020 9:57 pm
Dance with Shadows wrote:In metric, 90 60 90 is a little bit thin.
It rolls off the tongue a bit better than 91.44 x 60.96 x 91.44 though, don't you think?
- Stu's Dad
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 3:34 pm
- Full Real Name: Leonard Evans
Re: 36-24-36
by Dance with Shadows » Sun Feb 09, 2020 12:14 am
Hmm like round and round I'm willing to do some rounding
91 61 91 seems to be the right figures for the woman with the correct shape! As I said 90 60 90 and she's a bit too thin!
91 61 91 seems to be the right figures for the woman with the correct shape! As I said 90 60 90 and she's a bit too thin!
- Dance with Shadows
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 1:04 am
- Full Real Name: Michael Brooks
Re: 36-24-36
by Fenderman » Sun Feb 09, 2020 1:23 am
I enjoyed the live version from the 2004 tour. Was this the first time they played it live?
- Fenderman
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:17 pm
- Full Real Name: Alexander Thomson
14 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], pjr and 31 guests
These advertisements are selected and placed by Google to assist with the cost of site maintenance.
ShadowMusic is not responsible for the content of external advertisements.